The purpose of the KB (Known Bettor) Consensus table is to highlight wagers where a large percentage of sharp bettors are on one side of a wager versus the other side.
How does the analytic work? It scans every active sports market for the day. The analytic then looks for markets meeting key volume levels (based on sport). The analytic then looks at all the sharp bettors involved in that market and reports the percentage of sharp bettors on each side of the market. When there is a disparity where 60%+ of the sharp bettors in the market are on one side of a wager, at the current price, the wager will appear in the KB Consensus table. The KB Consensus analytic does not care if the sharp bettors involved are wagering above, below or at their average wager level.
As an example, let’s say the analytic is now scanning the spread market for LA Rams versus the NY Giants. The analytic will filter down to all the sharp bettors who currently have wagers within the spread market for the game. Now let’s say that “LA Rams SP” appears on the table with a KB Consensus reading of 72%. What that means is, of the sharp bettors who are actually betting the spread in the LAR/NYG game, 72% of them are betting the LA Rams, 28% are thereby betting the NY Giants.
For a play to be considered KB Consensus and trigger an alert, it needs to have 60% or more of the sharp bettors on the same side of the wager. You will see KB Consensus angles hit the analytics table as soon as they achieve 60% of known bettors on one side of a wager. Wagers will remain on the table even if they drop below 60%.
ANALYTIC NOTICE: Analytics are provided to give you access to information that you otherwise would not be able to obtain publicly.
Analytics ARE NOT DESIGNED NOR INTENDED to tell you what to bet. Analytics are provided to make you a more informed bettor when handicapping and making your wagering decisions.
If you are placing a wager simply because the wager shows up within an analytic or alert, you are using the information incorrectly, outside its intended use, and opening yourself up to unnecessary risk.
While some analytics and information covers sharp action, it should be noted that sharp action can occur for many reasons beyond sharp money feeling a wager has value. Sharp bettors frequently wager for the purposes of middling, arbitrage, hedging, buyouts and more. Analytics do not discern why sharp money is betting, they just report that sharp money is betting. Just because something shows as “sharp” should not be construed as meaning the wager has value 100% of the time. A wager showing as sharp should also not be construed as a best bet, regardless of the reading within the analytic. The best sharp bettors have a win percentage of 54-56% (betting spreads), not the 60-100% that many touts and other unsavory sports gambling industry jerkoffs (technical term) may want to portray.
Good luck in your action!